Vettel overtake riccado_FIA response
0
於
2012/11/29 20:03:10
發文
#2
0
這場Vettel有些急.....出現一些爭議性超車
但也算落幕了
紅軍還是全力備戰下賽季吧,2012有比2011進步很多了
我相信2013會更好🙂
但也算落幕了
紅軍還是全力備戰下賽季吧,2012有比2011進步很多了
我相信2013會更好🙂
#3
0
於
2012/11/29 22:27:41
發文
原來是早知道的事
事情終於結束了
網上的名嘴們應該也可以喝口水了
事情終於結束了
網上的名嘴們應該也可以喝口水了
#4
0
 |
|  | |
| FIA says 'no case' to answer in Vettel overtaking controversy Formula 1's ruling body, the FIA, says there is "no case" to answer in the controversy involving Sebastian Vettel's overtaking of Jean-Eric Vergne during the Brazilian Grand Prix. It confirmed exclusively to AUTOSPORT that it was in no doubt that Vettel's pass was legitimate. Vettel was crowned champion for the third time at Interlagos after finishing in sixth position in an action-packed race in which he was spun after making contact with Bruno Senna on the opening lap. Ferrari's Fernando Alonso finished in second position, a result that left him three points behind Vettel in the standings. On Wednesday evening, however, Ferrari said it was reviewing video footage allegedly showing Vettel overtaking Vergne in a yellow-flag sector between Turns 3 and 4 early in the race. The team stated on Thursday that it had written to the FIA asking for clarification over the matter. FIA sources have confirmed to AUTOSPORT that the yellow-flag sector at Interlagos started at the light panel just before Turn 3, at marshal sector 3, and ends about 150m before Turn 4, where a green light panel is displayed. However, there is a marshal's post in between these two panels and a green flag was being waved there on that lap. Under the FIA's rules for the Brazilian GP, if a green flag is displayed before a green light - as it was in Vettel's case - it is the first green that counts. Therefore, the FIA is in no doubt that Vettel's pass was legitimate, which is why race control was not informed of any potential infringement. The FIA confirmed to AUTOSPORT that no team had asked for a review of the incident. The ruling body also said it does not comment on the stewards' decisions. More to follow... ========so 合法喔========, 請龍迷別瞎猜了,Ferrari剛開始3圈就知道了,但當時vettel在最後又撞車,ferrari當時沒申訴就是因為沒必要,自己也覺得應該ok,等到 vettel追到第6才發現事情大條== 說真的,就算當時vettel真的被判driver though 20s,,,,回來後有safety car,要追到前8銘也不是難事~~ 😀😀😀😀😞😞😞 | |||
 |  |
回應 johnnieteng (rossi~kimi) 所寫法拉利又惱殘一例。
不管vet是否最後一位或追不追的上都應該往死裡打吧。
#5
0
於
2012/11/29 23:47:12
發文
|
| | |
| 原來是早知道的事 事情終於結束了 網上的名嘴們應該也可以喝口水了 | |||
| |
幹麻這樣..討論區本來就是拿來發表意見的
就算是自己亂編,也是代表很關注比賽
Formula 1's ruling body, the FIA, says there is "no case" to answer in the controversy involving Sebastian Vettel's overtaking of Jean-Eric Vergne during the Brazilian Grand Prix.
It confirmed exclusively to AUTOSPORT that it was in no doubt that Vettel's pass was legitimate.
Vettel was crowned champion for the third time at Interlagos after finishing in sixth position in an action-packed race in which he was spun after making contact with Bruno Senna on the opening lap.
Ferrari's Fernando Alonso finished in second position, a result that left him three points behind Vettel in the standings.
On Wednesday evening, however, Ferrari said it was reviewing video footage allegedly showing Vettel overtaking Vergne in a yellow-flag sector between Turns 3 and 4 early in the race.
The team stated on Thursday that it had written to the FIA asking for clarification over the matter.
FIA sources have confirmed to AUTOSPORT that the yellow-flag sector at Interlagos started at the light panel just before Turn 3, at marshal sector 3, and ends about 150m before Turn 4, where a green light panel is displayed.
However, there is a marshal's post in between these two panels and a green flag was being waved there on that lap.
Under the FIA's rules for the Brazilian GP, if a green flag is displayed before a green light - as it was in Vettel's case - it is the first green that counts.
Therefore, the FIA is in no doubt that Vettel's pass was legitimate, which is why race control was not informed of any potential infringement.
The FIA confirmed to AUTOSPORT that no team had asked for a review of the incident. The ruling body also said it does not comment on the stewards' decisions.
More to follow...
========so 合法喔========,
請龍迷別瞎猜了,Ferrari剛開始3圈就知道了,但當時vettel在最後又撞車,ferrari當時沒申訴就是因為沒必要,自己也覺得應該ok,等到
vettel追到第6才發現事情大條==
說真的,就算當時vettel真的被判driver though 20s,,,,回來後有safety car,要追到前8銘也不是難事~~
😀😀😀😀😞😞😞